Note: As Chinese companies expand overseas and cross-border transactions become more frequent, the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in China have become a core link in cross-border debt recovery and dispute resolution. In particular, as Singapore is the core hub for Chinese companies to expand overseas in Southeast Asia, the demand for cross-border judgment enforcement between China and Singapore is increasing year by year.
However, foreign judgments do not have automatic execution in China and must go through statutory recognition and enforcement procedures and meet strict legal conditions.
This article combines China's Civil Procedure Law, China-Singapore judicial practice and typical cases in recent years to sort out the legal basis, review focus, common obstacles and practical preparation matters for the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in China, and highlights the issues that need to be paid attention to when applying for the recognition and enforcement of Singapore judgments in China.
01 Legal basis: The core basis for the enforcement of foreign judgments in China
China's recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments are mainly based on international treaties, bilateral treaties or the principle of reciprocity. For countries and regions that have not established treaty arrangements with China on the recognition and enforcement of judgments, the principle of reciprocity often becomes the key to whether an application can be established. The core legal basis includes three levels:
- Domestic legal basis
Articles 298-301 of the "Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China" (amended in 2023) clearly stipulates: If a legally effective judgment or ruling issued by a foreign court requires recognition and enforcement by the People's Court of the People's Republic of China, the party concerned may directly apply to the Intermediate People's Court of the People's Republic of China with jurisdiction for recognition and enforcement, or the foreign court may request the People's Court for recognition and enforcement in accordance with the provisions of the international treaty concluded or acceded to by the country and the People's Republic of China, or in accordance with the principle of reciprocity.
- Bilateral mutual legal assistance treaties
As of 2026, China has signed civil and commercial judicial assistance treaties with more than 40 countries. The Treaty on Judicial Assistance in Civil and Commercial Matters signed by China and Singapore in 1997 and came into effect in 1999 does not include the recognition and enforcement of court judgments. It only applies to matters related to the service of judicial documents, investigation and evidence collection, and arbitration awards. Therefore, Singapore judgments cannot be directly enforced in China based on bilateral treaties and must still rely on the principle of reciprocity.
- Special rules for arbitral awards
Special attention should be paid to the fact that the basis for enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and foreign court judgments are completely different.
Foreign arbitral awards can be recognized and enforced in China in accordance with the New York Convention, and the path to cross-border dispute resolution is relatively certain. When China joined, it made commercial reservations and reciprocal reservations: only arbitral awards made in the territory of another contracting state will be recognized and enforced, and only applicable to disputes arising from contractual and non-contractual commercial legal relationships under Chinese law.
Foreign court judgments can only be enforced on the basis of bilateral judicial assistance treaties or the principle of reciprocity. The key to whether court judgments from non-treaty countries can be recognized and enforced in China lies in whether a reciprocal relationship can be proven. In recent years, the recognition of reciprocal relationships by Chinese courts has shifted from the early emphasis on "factual reciprocity" to "legal reciprocity" and case-by-case review, which no longer necessarily requires foreign courts to recognize Chinese judgments in advance. However, in specific cases, applicants still need to fully prepare materials focusing on issues such as ascertainment of foreign law, finality of judgment, procedural legitimacy, jurisdictional basis, and public interest.
02 Core premise: Which foreign judgments can be recognized by Chinese courts?
According to Chinese laws and bilateral treaties, in order for foreign judgments to be recognized and enforced in China, the following six core conditions must be met at the same time, none of which is indispensable:
- The court of the country where the original judgment was made has legal jurisdiction
For Singapore court judgments, Chinese courts usually review whether the original court has a reasonable basis for jurisdiction based on factors such as the connection points of the case, whether the parties have effectively chosen the jurisdiction of the Singapore court, and whether the defendant has received sufficient procedural protections. If a foreign court clearly violates the exclusive jurisdiction agreement between the parties, or judges that it does not have jurisdiction according to Chinese law, it may constitute an obstacle to non-recognition and enforcement.
- The judgment has taken legal effect
The judgment applied for execution must be a final and effective judgment issued by the court of the country where the judgment was made. First-instance judgments that have not yet taken effect and judgments that are under appeal are not eligible.
- Fair proceedings
The litigation procedures of the court in the country where the original judgment was made must protect the litigation rights of the parties. If the defendant has been lawfully summoned and has sufficient opportunity to respond, there will be no default judgment and no legal service.
- Does not violate China’s public interests
The content and execution results of the judgment must not violate the basic principles of Chinese law, national sovereignty, security and social and public interests. This is the core red line of review by Chinese courts and one of the most common grounds for rejection.
- There are no parallel proceedings or prior judgments
Chinese courts have not made judgments on the same dispute between the same parties, nor have they recognized and enforced judgments made by courts in third countries on the same dispute.
- Comply with bilateral treaties or the principle of reciprocity
If the original judgment country has a bilateral judicial assistance treaty with China, it must meet all the conditions stipulated in the treaty; if there is no treaty, it must prove that China has a reciprocal relationship with that country.
03 Why are most foreign judgments difficult to enforce in practice?
1. No treaty support + difficulty in proving reciprocal relations
China and major economic and trade partners such as Singapore, the United States, and the United Kingdom have not entered into bilateral treaties on the recognition and enforcement of judgments. Applicants must provide evidence to prove a "reciprocal relationship." Even though Chinese courts have gradually relaxed the rule from "factual reciprocity" to "legal reciprocity", it is still difficult to ascertain foreign laws and prepare reciprocal evidence. This is the main reason why foreign judgments cannot be implemented.
2. Defects in the service process of default judgment
If an overseas court's service on a party in China does not comply with the Hague Service Convention or statutory requirements, it will easily be rejected due to procedural legitimacy issues.
3. The evidence materials have not been notarized and certified / attached certificates
All judgments, validity certificates, service certificates, etc. formed overseas must be notarized, attached certificates (Apostille) or certified by the embassy or consulate, and must be accompanied by a qualified Chinese translation. Any missing link will be directly rejected.
4. Jurisdiction objection supported
If the contract stipulates that the Chinese court has exclusive jurisdiction, or the jurisdiction of the foreign court clearly exceeds the reasonable scope, the Chinese court will reject the application on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction.
5. Missing property clues
Even if the judgment is recognized, no clues about the debtor's valid property in China can be provided, and the execution process will still be stalled.
6. Exceeding the time limit for application execution
The enforcement period of the application is generally handled in accordance with the two-year provisions of China's civil enforcement procedures. If the period is obviously exceeded, it may trigger a statute of limitations defense by the respondent and affect the progress of subsequent execution.
04 Full-process practical operation: Step-by-step guide for the enforcement of foreign judgments in China
Foreign judgments in China usually involve two aspects: "recognition effect" and "enforcement content". Depending on the needs of the case, the applicant may only apply for recognition of the validity of the foreign judgment, or may apply for recognition and enforcement at the same time. If the court finds that the conditions are met after review, it will rule to recognize its validity; if the content of the judgment is enforceable and meets the conditions for execution, it can further enter the enforcement procedure. The whole process usually takes 6-12 months. The specific steps are as follows:
Step 1: Prepare complete application materials
Application for recognition and enforcement (states the basic information of the applicant and respondent, application matters, facts and reasons); the original and Chinese translation of the foreign court judgment that has been notarized and certified/attached to the certificate; the certificate of effectiveness of the judgment and its Chinese translation that has been notarized and certified/attached to the certificate; Proof of legal delivery and Chinese translation of the notarization and certification/additional certificate; proof of the applicant’s subject qualifications and notarization and certification/additional certificate documents; power of attorney (notarization and certification/additional certificate must be obtained when entrusting a Chinese lawyer to represent you); a list of clues to the debtor’s property in China.
Step 2: Submit an application to the court of competent jurisdiction
The competent court is the Intermediate People's Court where the respondent is domiciled or the property is located, and the parties concerned shall submit applications directly to the Chinese courts.
Step Three: Court Review and Ruling
Chinese courts form a collegial panel to conduct review, and the review period is usually 3-6 months. The respondent has the right to raise objections. If the review passes, the foreign judgment will be recognized as valid; if the review fails, the application will be rejected.
Step 4: Enter enforcement
After the court rules to recognize it, it can apply for enforcement. The procedures are consistent with the execution of domestic judgments, including property investigation, seizure, seizure, auction, and deduction. The application execution period generally refers to the two-year period.
05 Key points: Special considerations for enforcing Singapore judgments in China
Although there is currently no legally binding mutual recognition treaty between China and Singapore, existing judicial practices and guiding documents provide important reference for the recognition and enforcement of commercial monetary judgments between the two countries. In particular, the case in which the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court judgment was regarded as an important breakthrough for Chinese courts recognizing foreign commercial judgments based on the principle of reciprocity. Compared with other non-treaty countries, the recognition and enforcement of Singapore judgments in China is relatively more predictable. The following points require attention in practice:
1. Finality and executable content are key
In practice, emphasis should be placed on examining whether Singapore judgments are final, conclusive, and enforceable civil and commercial monetary judgments. Judgments that are still in the appeal process, have intermediate rulings in proceedings, or have judgments with uncertain amounts are generally not suitable candidates for direct application for recognition and enforcement.
2. Iconic cases provide strong guidance
At present, the number of public cases of mutual recognition of judgments between China and Singapore is limited, but they have landmark ice-breaking significance: Nanjing Intermediate People's Court, Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court, etc. have successively recognized Singapore court judgments based on factual reciprocity and legal reciprocity, providing important reference for subsequent similar cases.
3. Be wary of cross-border property transfers and arrange property investigations in advance
For situations where the debtor transfers or conceals property through affiliated companies, offshore structures, trust arrangements or nominal holders, creditors should simultaneously conduct property investigation and evidence fixation before the judgment is recognized and executed. As for whether to add persons subject to execution, hold shareholders accountable, or break through nominal holding arrangements, it still needs to be judged separately based on China's company law, enforcement procedural rules and individual case evidence, and cannot be applied automatically.
4. Choosing between arbitral awards and court judgments
For cross-border disputes, it is recommended to give priority to arbitration at the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC). Arbitral awards can be recognized and enforced in China in accordance with the New York Convention. The path to resolution of cross-border disputes is relatively certain; Singapore court judgments need to be reviewed based on the principle of reciprocity, which takes longer and is more uncertain.
5. No need to execute in Singapore first
After the Singapore judgment takes effect, you can apply directly to the Chinese court for recognition and enforcement without first initiating enforcement proceedings in Singapore.
06 Front-end risk control: How to avoid "winning on paper"?
The core of cross-border debt recovery is payment collection, and companies should conduct risk control during the transaction stage:
1. Prefer arbitration in contract terms
Cross-border contracts give priority to international arbitration such as SIAC and ICC. Arbitral awards can be recognized and enforced in China in accordance with the New York Convention, and are much more stable than court judgments.
2. Conduct property investigations and seek preservation early
Investigate the other party's assets in China before signing a contract; promptly apply for property preservation after a dispute occurs to prevent the transfer of assets.
3. Ensure procedural compliance in overseas litigation
Focus on ensuring that the delivery is legal, the judgment is effective, and complete notarized and certified documents are retained.
4. Choose a professional cross-border lawyer
Lawyers who are familiar with both Chinese and Singaporean laws will coordinate the entire application, review and execution process.
Conclusion
The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in China is not a simple procedural issue, but a systematic project involving institutional rules, legal application, evidence compliance, judicial cooperation, and property investigation and control. For enterprises, winning a lawsuit overseas is only the starting point, and smooth execution within China is the goal. In the context of China-Singapore economic and trade deepening, only by mastering cross-border enforcement rules in advance, doing pre-risk control, and choosing professional lawyers can we truly avoid "winning on paper" and achieve debt collection.
In the complex global trade environment, compliance and risk control are the core competitiveness of enterprises going overseas. Only by planning in advance and responding professionally can legitimate rights and interests be protected in cross-border disputes.
For judgments or award executions in cross-border disputes, companies should consider comprehensive risk control at the front end of the transaction; only with advance planning under professional guidance can the optimal path be found between front-end risk control and back-end execution.
— END —
- This article is only a popular science on cross-border dispute resolution and judgment enforcement risks, and does not constitute legal advice on individual cases. The specific plan needs to be judged individually based on nationality, habitual residence, location of assets in China and Singapore, transaction background, evidence materials and signing process.
This article is general information and not legal advice. Specific matters require assessment by appropriately qualified professionals.